Legal Opinion · Dissent

Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 26, 1954No. C. D. 1580Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Laweence, Judge:

For the reasons assigned infra, I respectfully dissent from the decision and judgment expressed by the majority.

In our original decision in this case, reported as Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United States, 26 Cust. Ct. 408, Abstract 55471, it was the unanimous opinion of the court that the subject merchandise— key electrical sockets — was properly classified by the collector of customs as “Articles or wares not specially provided for, if composed wholly or in chief value of * * * copper * * *, but not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Globe Lighting Fixture Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API