Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 17, 1951No. C. D. 1320PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

An importation from Mexico described on the consular invoice as “Metal Push-Button Sockets” was classified by the collector of customs at the port of Chicago as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed of metal, within the purview of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1001, par. 397), *174and duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem. In addition thereto a copper tax of three-fourths of 1 cent per pound was imposed pursuant to section 3425 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. §3425). The imposition of this additional…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Globe Lighting Fixture Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API