Legal Opinion
McCullough v. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 23, 2009No. 08-1353PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.
A1 McCullough brought claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act (“ACRA”), Ark.Code Ann. § 16-123-101 et seq., alleging that his employer, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), and individuals Jim Raczynski and Hosea Long, discriminated against him on the basis of sex and retaliated against him for participation in a protected activity. He also brought claims alleging retaliation for the exercise of his free speech rights under the First Amendment and the Arkansas Constitution,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DAVID GRIFFITH, PLAINTIFF—APPELLANT v. CITY OF DES MOINES, DEFENDANTS—APPELLEESCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Beshears v. AsbillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Wierman v. Casey's General StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Barber v. C1 Truck Driver Training, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.