Legal Opinion
Wierman v. Casey's General Stores
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 31, 2011No. 10-1665PublishedCited by 253 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Charity L. Wierman sued her former employer, Casey’s Marketing Company and Casey’s General Stores, Inc. (“Casey’s”). She asserts pregnancy discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17) and the Missouri Human Rights Act (Mo.Rev.Stat § 213.055) (“MHRA”). She also alleges retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2) (“FMLA”). Casey’s moved for summary judgment on all claims, which the district court granted. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by253 opinions
- Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Barbara Hager v. Arkansas Dept. of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Budhun v. Reading Hospital & Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Lavera Granetha Ashanti v. City of Golden ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.