Standard Scale & Supply Co. v. Cropp Concrete MacHinery Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtLuse, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). 1. Defendant’s first attack is on the allowance to plaintiffs of the amount incurred by plaintiffs for the services and expenses of accountants in the sum o'f $52,508.87. In the proceedings before the master, defendant was ordered to file its account under rule No. 63, the order being agreed upon by counsel as to its form, and in response filed an account in debit and credit form, which fell short of giving the information called for in the order. Thereupon plaintiffs applied to the master for an order directing defendant to produce before him its books,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Computing Scale Co. v. Toledo Computing Scale Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ruth v. Stearns-Roger Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1935
- National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1930
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Starr Piano Co. v. Auto Pneumatic Action Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
- Motor Player Corporation v. Piano Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.