Reynolds v. Maine Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The evidence warranted the following findings of fact: The plaintiff was employed by the defendants to drive a team, and draw refrigerators from their elevator to their storehouse. A large, heavy wagon was used for that purpose. The body of the wagon was attached to the forward axle by a kingbolt which went through the axle. On the sixth day after the plaintiff began work, and while taking his first full load of refrigerators from the elevator to the storehouse, the kingbolt broke, the forward part of the body of the wagon fell to the ground, the plaintiff fell from the wagon seat onto the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lyman v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
- Bixby v. ThurberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- Lacoss v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
- Whitcher v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899
- Fuller v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Estate v. International Harvester CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Young v. ClogstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Tetreault v. GouldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
- Spinosa v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.