Legal Opinion

Hankin v. GRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 8, 2010No. 100,838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larson, J.:

This appeal involves the complexity that arises between the state courts of Pennsylvania and Kansas in dealing with a Pennsylvania judgment registered in Kansas under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution, U.S. Const, art. IV, § 1, and utilizing the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgment Act (KUEFJA), enacted in Kansas at K.S.A. 60-3001 et seq.

Mark Hankin utilized the KUEFJA to register a judgment in Johnson County District Court that he obtained against Graphic Technology, Inc. (GTI), in the Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Court of Common Pleas in…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. SourkCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. Master Finance Co. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API