Legal Opinion

Rodziewicz v. Beyer

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 22, 1992No. Civ. 92-1277 (GEB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GARRETT E. BROWN, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The motion raises the question whether an inmate is precluded from litigating in federal court constitutional issues that were decided against him by the state court on appeal from a prison disciplinary hearing. For the reasons set forth in this Memorandum and Order, issued without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78, the Court concludes that the inmate is precluded from relitigating his claims. Accordingly, the Court will grant the motion.

BACKGROUND

Pl…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. HolveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Gunter v. Ridgewood Energy Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  3. Sibert v. PhelanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
  4. Williams v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Jones v. HolveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API