Ridgway v. Phillips

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIRSTIN RIDGWAY, Case No. 18-cv-07822-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 SANDY PHILLIPS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 49 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sandy Phillips’s motion for summary judgment. 14 Dkt. No. 49. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN 15 PART the motion. 16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 17 Plaintiff Kirstin Ridgway initially filed this action in Sonoma County Superior Court 18 against…