In re the Estate of Saxton

Appeals (1) from that part of an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Broome County (Thomas, S.), entered April 17, 1996, which denied petitioner’s motion to compel discovery, (2) from an order of said court, entered *734December 16, 1996, which denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration, and (3) from an order of said court, entered December 16, 1996, which denied petitioner’s motion to compel compliance with a subpoena duces tecum.

The facts underlying these appeals have been previously reviewed by us (219 AD2d 85). While we addressed six orders of the Surrogate’s Court therein, the orders dated…