Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Griffin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1998No. 276PA97PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

Charles Henderson had been given notice by the Bullocks that they would seek to have sanctions imposed upon him for filing a peti tion for an adoption. After the hearing, the court did not impose sanctions for the filing of the adoption petition. It did, however, on its own motion, impose sanctions for the filing of pleadings for which Mr. Henderson had not received notice that such sanctions would be sought. We agree with Mr. Henderson that this was error.

“Notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to depriving a person of his property are essential elements of due process of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. GieseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. McDonald's Corp. v. DwyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Taylor v. Taylor Products Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Polygenex International, Inc. v. Polyzen, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Zaliagiris v. ZaliagirisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Egelhof Ex Rel. Red Hat, Inc. v. SzulikCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. In Re the Order Sanctioning SmallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API