Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beattie v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Carpenter, J. Case by Eva M. Beattie against the city of Detroit for personal injuries., From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1DissentGrant, J.

The city of Detroit, through its board of public works, made a contract with one Julius Porath to repave National avenue “in conformity with the specifications and estimates hereto attached and made part of this contract, * * * and according to all the conditions herein named.” The other parts of the contract, so far as plaintiff’s counsel has considered it material to state them, are as follows:

1. “To erect and maintain a good and sufficient fenco, railing, or barrier around any and all excavations necessary for said work, in such a manner as to prevent accidents.”

2. “To do all work * * * in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. CoreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Pettengill v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Baker v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Southwell v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Monje v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Hugo v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Thompson v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Barker v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API