Legal Opinion

Barker v. City of Kalamazoo

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1906No. Docket No. 85PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kalamazoo; Adams, J. Case by AlmedaE. Barker against the city of Kalamazoo for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant for injuries received from falling on a temporary cross-walk at the intersection of West Main and West streets, in the city of Kalamazoo. Main street runs east and west. West street crosses it at right angles, running north and south, A paving company was laying a pavement on Main street at the point in question. The old block pavement had been torn up, the boards on which it rested taken out, and the gravel foundation thereunder excavated to considerable depth. One track of the street car line on Main street had been relaid on a cement…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brezee v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Beattie v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hughes v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API