Legal Opinion
William Dan Deford v. Secretary of Labor, and Tennessee Valley Authority, Intervenor. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Secretary of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 10, 1983No. 81-3228, 81-3254 and 81-3401PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, Chief Judge.
This appeal concerns three consolidated petitions for review of Orders rendered by the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (Secretary) pursuant to the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 5851, and regulations promulgated thereunder. Petitioners are William Dan DeFord (DeFord) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The Secretary, in sum, awarded relief to DeFord upon finding that TVA had illegally discriminated against DeFord because he assisted or participated in a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) investigation at a TVA facility.
I
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. ScrivenerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John J. Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Ashok K. Avasthi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Reynold Floyd Reep v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gary Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Joan Sheehan, Formerly Known as Joan Wycoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v. United States Department of Labor and Robert Reich, the Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Robert MacKowiak v. University Nuclear Systems, Inc., and Secretary, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.