Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ellis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 14, 1999PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

The matter before us involves the question whether or not the Attorney General’s office is a disinterested prosecutor and, therefore, the indictments against the defendants should have been dismissed, or, alternatively, the Attorney General’s office should be disqualified from prosecuting the indictments. Each defendant was a partner, of counsel, an employee, or a client of the former Worcester law firm of Ellis & Ellis, and each is charged with insurance fraud and related offenses. The firm represented plaintiffs in workers’ compensation and personal injury cases. The defendant, James N.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Ward v. Village of MonroevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Justices of the Superior Court Department of the Massachusetts Trial CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. United States v. PimentalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Hambarian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API