Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Robinson

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by defendant for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is an application by defendant for leave to amend his answer by withdrawing therefrom an admission as to the elevators being in charge of and under the control of and operated and managed by defendant, his agents, servants and employees, and substituting therefor a denial thereof. The proposed amended answer is not verified by the defendant, nor does the defendant make the affidavit upon which the motion is made; Neither do the moving papers disclose any reason why the affidavit is not made by defendant. The motion, therefore, must be denied. Aborn v. Waite, 30 Misc. Rep. 317. Besides, I…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Equitable Mortgage Co.New York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Aborn v. WaiteNew York Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Treadwell v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API