Legal Opinion

Treadwell v. Clark

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by defendants for leave to amend their answers.

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

Defendants move for leave to amend their answers so as to deny the plaintiff’s alleged residence in this State and to plead the Statute of Limitations of the State of Montana and want of jurisdiction in this court. The plaintiff alleges in his complaint, verified in November, 1899, that he is a resident of the State of New York. Issue was joined in December, 1899, by service of defendants’ answers, in which, by not denying, they admit that plaintiff was a resident of New York. The case was tried in June, 1901, and in May, 1902, the Appellate Division ordered a new trial. In October, 1904, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryan v. DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. A. & S. Henry & Company v. TalcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Diehl v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Guttentag v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Wilcox v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haskell v. MoranAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API