Legal Opinion

Aborn v. Waite

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for leave to amend answer.

1Opinion of the Court

Beekman, J,

The history of this action is somewhat extraordinary. Issue was joined on July 12, 1897, by the service of an answer. On October sixth of that year, an amended answer was served. On January 31, 1898, the answer was again .amended, and on April 22, 1898, and on June 25, 1898, the answer was amended for the third and fourth times. The cause finally came on for trial'before a jury on ¡November 27, 1899, when the defendant was permitted to withdraw a juror on terms in order to apply to the Special Term for leave again, and for the fifth time to amend his plea. This motion has…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fromme v. LisnerNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald Bros. Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1947
  2. Quarantiello v. Grand Trunk Railway Co. of CanadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Diehl v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API