Zwirtz v. Dorl
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
.Opinion by
SHACKELFORD, C.
The plaintiff in error was the defendant in the trial court, and the defendant in error was plaintiff. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, as they ■appeared in the court below.
The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant to cancel a deed executed by Magdalena Dorl, purporting to convey to defendant, Louisa Zwirtz, a quarter section of land in Pawnee county, described as the northeast quarter of section 18, township 21 north, range 6 east I. M., and to quite title thereto as against defendant, and for possession. The grounds…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Post v. HaganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Homer v. LesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Montgomery v. WillbanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- White v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- McSpadden v. MahoneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Allen v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- McKeehen v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.