Legal Opinion
Plung v. Cohen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 14, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered April 7, 1997, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to supplement her bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff alleges that defendants are the owners of the building in which she is employed by a building tenant, and that she tripped over a black sticky substance she believes was debris left on the floor by carpeting contractors who were working on another office on plaintiff’s floor. The action was properly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Gibson v. Worthington Division of McGraw-Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Manning v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Farrell v. Dick Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ahmad v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Hinton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Del Rosario v. 114 Fifth Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Dixon v. Nur-Hom Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998