Legal Opinion
Walraven v. Walraven
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 18, 1948No. 31789PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
The applicant filed demurrers to the caveat as amended. The trial judge sustained the demurrers and struck paragraphs three, four, and five of the caveat. The caveators excepted pendente lite. Later the caveators amended their caveat to meet the order sustaining the demurrers to paragraphs three and four. The caveators now assign as error the ruling of the trial judge on the demurrers.
“Where a party submits to a ruling sustaining a demurrer to his pleading, by filing an amendment to meet the grounds of demurrer, he can not afterwards insist upon an assignment of error on exceptions pendente…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Woodruff v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Cheney v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Rivers v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Lang v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- National City Bank of Rome v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Adams v. RicksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Rollins v. Great Southwest Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- State Highway Department v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.