State Highway Department v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
Special ground 2 of the amended motion for new trial complains of the following excerpt from the charge to the jury: “The general rule, Gentlemen, is where property is taken for public purposes the measure of damages is the difference between the market value immediately before and after the damages; that applies to the consequential damages, if any, are involved in this case.” (Emphasis supplied). Two paragraphs prior to this excerpt, the court had correctly charged this same proposition, using the word taking, rather than damages, but he prefaced his reading of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Limbert v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- State Highway Department v. AndrusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Andrus v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Walraven v. WalravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Smith v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Highway Department v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Strickland v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Barrow v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Perry v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Strickland v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990