Besserman v. Town of Paradise Valley, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Acting Presiding Judge.
Richard and Rosalie Besserman bring this appeal from the granting of summary judg ment in favor of the Town of Paradise Valley. Their complaint had alleged that the town was liable for damages caused by a bad faith and malicious inspection of their home performed by the town’s building inspector and for damages based on theories of fraud and third-party beneficiary contract. We find that the summary judgment was proper.
Appellant’s contention that the town is liable for the bad faith and malicious inspection is premised upon two theories: (1) that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Massengill v. Yuma CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Hoffert v. Owatonna Inn Towne Motel, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Duran v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rich v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Hilliard v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- State v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Jesik v. Maricopa County Community College DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- McGeorge v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.