Legal Opinion
In re: David William Bartenwerfer and Kate Marie Bartenwerfer
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 23, 2020No. NC-19-1016-TaFB NC-19-1025-TaFBUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
FILED APR 23 2020 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. NC-19-1016-TaFB NC-19-1025-TaFB DAVID WILLIAM BARTENWERFER and (Cross Appeals) KATE MARIE BARTENWERFER, Bk. No. 3:13-bk-30827 Debtors. Adv. No. 3:13-ap-03185 KIERAN BUCKLEY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. MEMORANDUM* DAVID WILLIAM BARTENWERFER; KATE MARIE BARTENWERFER, Appellees/Cross-Appellants. Argued and Submitted on March 26, 2020 Filed – April 23, 2020 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. Edriver Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Shanks v. DresselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.