Legal Opinion

Belt v. Spaulding

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This action is brought by George W. Belt, district attorney of the third judicial district, to recover two thousand dollars, alleged to be due from the defendants as bail for one G. H. Davis.

It appears from the court’s findings that on the eighteenth day of June, 1887, one William Yergen charged one Dr. Davis, in effect, with the crime of manslaughter by assaulting one Lizzie Yergen, in Marion County, Oregon, on the seventh day of June, 1887, who was then pregnant with a quick child, and by the use of instruments destroying said child, the same not being necessary to preserve the life of said…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. KaneNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Abrams v. FosheeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  3. Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Bacon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  5. Henderson v. TrimbleTexas Supreme Court · 1852

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. United States v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  3. Malheur County v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Marmaduke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. Hassan v. EarllMontana Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API