Legal Opinion
Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Digene Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 3, 2003No. 02-212PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Currently pending is Digene Corporation’s (“Digene”) Motion For Leave to Amend Its Answer and Counterclaims (D.I.83). For the reasons discussed, the motion will be granted.
I. Factual Background
This is a patent infringement action brought by Plaintiff Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. (“Enzo”) against defendant Digene involving U.S. Patent No. 6,221,581B1 (the “’581 Patent”), issued on April 24, 2001. Both Enzo and Digene are companies involved in the development, manufacture and distribution of proprietary RNA and DNA testing systems. The ’581 Patent concerns…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Elk Corporation Of Dallas v. Gaf Building Materials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marlowe Patent Holdings LLC v. Dice Electronics, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Icu Medical, Inc. v. Rymed Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Bartronics, Inc. v. Power-One, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Birchwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Battenfeld Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Eve-USA, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.