Coast Lumber Co. v. Wood
Idaho Supreme Court
An original application to this court for a writ of mandate lo Honorable Fremont Wood, Judge of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, to compel him to settle a statement on motion for a new trial.
Read the full summary
An original application to this court for a writ of mandate lo Honorable Fremont Wood, Judge of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, to compel him to settle a statement on motion for a new trial. The question now before the court for decision has in principle been directly decided in the case of Miller v. Hunt, 7 Ida. 486, 63 Pac. 803. The language of the statute with regard to the time when the statement to which no amendments have been proposed shall be presented to the trial judge for settlement is practically identical with the language in the statute where amendments have…
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, C. J.
This is an original application to this court for a writ of mandate to compel Honorable Fremont Wood, judge of the district court of the third judicial district, to settle a statement on motion for a new trial and appeal, in the ease of Charles N. Maw, plaintiff, v. The Coast Lumber Co., a corporation. That action was brought to recover for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of a defective, unsafe and insecure condition of a certain ripsaw used in the mill of the defendant. The said plaintiff was injured by being struck on the head by a piece of board or timber…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hicks v. MastenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Humbird Lumber Co. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Jordan v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Hoehnan v. New York Drygoods Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robinson v. St. Maries Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Parker v. BambergerUtah Supreme Court · 1941