Dunbar v. Strimas
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANKS, Judge.
Plaintiffs sued to recover compensatory and punitive damages for alleged “severe emotional distress” inflicted upon plaintiff, Delana Dunbar, by defendant’s course of conduct which plaintiffs alleged “constituted outrageous conduct.”
Acting on a motion to dismiss filed by defendant after each side filed affidavits, the trial judge dismissed the suit on the grounds: “that the bill of complaint does not state a cause of action based upon outrageous conduct” and, apparently, on the ground of privileged conduct, i.e., “no cause of action exists against this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Taylor v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bradshaw v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Conley v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- Bass v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Dunn v. Moto Photo, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.