Legal Opinion
Application of True Temper Corp
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 21, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6098PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rendered by the Assistant Commissioner, 98 U.S.P.Q. 412, affirming the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Marks refusing registration on the Principal Register of appellant’s mark “Crippled Shad” as applied to artificial fish lures. The application for registration, filed January 25, 1950, under Sec. 2(f) of the Trade-Mark Act of July 5, 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052 (f), alleged September 6, 1941 as the date of first use of the mark.
The examiner denied registration on the stated ground that since the trademark,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steele v. Bulova Watch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Baglin v. Cusenier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- James Heddon's Sons v. Millsite Steel & Wire Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Celanese Corp. v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bass Buster, Inc. v. Gapen Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
- Application of Meyer & Wenthe, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- TracFone Wireless, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2019