Legal Opinion

H-K Contractors, Inc. v. City of Firth

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1979No. 12968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment wherein plaintiff-respondent, H-K Contractors, Inc., recovered $7,568.10 for labor and materials it furnished as a subcontractor under a public works contract. The facts are not in dispute and the only issue is whether the provisions of I.C. § 50-219, requiring “claims for damages” to be submitted to a city within sixty days of the time the “damages” occurred, are applicable under the circumstances presented in the case at bar. We hold the notice provisions of I.C. § 50-219 inapplicable and affirm the summary judgment.

Defendant-appella…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hook v. HornerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Cooper v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Nickerson v. MecklemOregon Supreme Court · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyde v. FisherIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API