H-K Contractors, Inc. v. City of Firth
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment wherein plaintiff-respondent, H-K Contractors, Inc., recovered $7,568.10 for labor and materials it furnished as a subcontractor under a public works contract. The facts are not in dispute and the only issue is whether the provisions of I.C. § 50-219, requiring “claims for damages” to be submitted to a city within sixty days of the time the “damages” occurred, are applicable under the circumstances presented in the case at bar. We hold the notice provisions of I.C. § 50-219 inapplicable and affirm the summary judgment.
Defendant-appella…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- Hook v. HornerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Cooper v. MorinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Nickerson v. MecklemOregon Supreme Court · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hyde v. FisherIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005