Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Parktowne Construction, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2005No. 30549Published

1DissentJustice Jones

Because the counterclaim Park Towne unsuccessfully pursued against Oldcastle was related directly to the subcontract work that Oldcastle was seeking to recover for when this suit was initiated, I believe that Idaho Code § 54-1929 must be construed to allow attorney fees for successfully defeating the counterclaim. To hold otherwise would impair the rights afforded to mechanics, laborers, and materialmen under the laws of Idaho.

Idaho has a strong tradition of supporting the right of laborers and materialmen to obtain payment for their work and materials. Indeed, the Idaho Constitution provides…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. Faris-Kesl Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. City of Weippe v. YarnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Beco Construction Co. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Minidoka County Ex Rel. Detweiler Bros. v. KriegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API