Legal Opinion
Schleining v. Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 27, 2011No. 10-35792PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BEA, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to determine whether a prisoner is eligible for federal Good Conduct Time (“GCT”) under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b)(1) for time he served in state prison on state charges, before being sentenced on a related charge in federal court. We hold that he is not so eligible.
Federal prisoner Russell Schleining appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging the Bureau of Prison’s (“BOP”) calculation of his Good Conduct Time (“GCT”) credit under 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). Schleining contends that he accrued 82 days of GCT…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Barber v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- James Ray Thomas v. R.D. Brewer, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Juan A. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ileto v. Glock, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State of Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Lopez v. TerrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Al-Marri v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Stand Up for California! v. UsdoiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.