Kanab City v. Popowich
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
BENCH, Judge:
{1 Defendant Jeff Popowich appeals the decision of the district court finding him guilty on four counts of failing to maintain a city dog license and one count of running an illegal kennel, all violations of the Kanab City *200Code. We affirm because Defendant's sufficiency of the evidence claim is not properly before us and the kennel permit ordinance is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Defendant.
BACKGROUND
T2 In December 2005, a Kanab City animal control officer (the Officer) responded to numerous complaints of barking dogs at Defendant's residence. The Officer observed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HonieUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Monticello v. ChristensenUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RossUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Bernat v. AllphinUtah Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orem City v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012