Legal Opinion

Doup v. Almand

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 19, 1948No. 4-8369PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Minor W. Millwee, Justice.

This is an action by appellee, John P. Almand, to recover compensation for his services as an architect in the preparation of plans and specifications for re-construction of an ice plant for appellant, H. C. Doup, in the City of North Little Rock, Arkansas. The cause was tried before the court without a jury upon the testimony of the parties and one other witness. This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee in the sum of $720.

It is undisputed that the parties entered into an oral agreement whereby appellant employed appellee to draw plans and specifications…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Weinberg v. NaherWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bender v. BeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  3. Union Central Life Insurance v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  4. Hollowoa v. BuckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Read's Drug Store v. Hessig-Ellis Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Edgar H. Wood Associates, Inc. v. SkeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  2. North v. PhilliberSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Karam v. HalkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Eagle Properties, Inc. v. West & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Rich v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API