Legal Opinion

Lamare v. North Country Animal League

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 12, 1999No. 98-258PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Plaintiffs Chasidy Lamare and Charles Arnold appeal a summary judgment of the Lamoille Superior Court in favor of defendants North Country Animal League, Darcie Fitzgerald, and John and Jane Doe. Plaintiffs raise numerous claims challenging the court’s ruling that their possessory interest in a lost dog had been transferred to defendants under the Town of Wolcott’s dog control ordinance. We affirm.

The following facts are undisputed. Plaintiffs were the co-owners of a five and one-half year old female German Shepard named Billy. They acquired the dog as a puppy and registered it with the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hugh C. Porter v. Susan Diblasio, Dane County Humane Society, Paul W. Humphrey, and Dane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Nicchia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Price v. LelandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  5. Robes v. Town of HartfordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goodby v. Vetpharm, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  2. Lamoria v. LamoriaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  3. Stella v. Spaulding and Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. LaMoria v. LaMoriaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  5. Darryl Lunon v. Kathy BotsfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API