Legal Opinion

Grant v. Hughes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1946No. 2576PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, Justice.

The transcript and statement of facts in this case were tendered to the clerk of this court on the 20th day of July, 1946. The clerk refused to file them because more than 60 days had elapsed since the final judgment or order overruling motion for -new trial, as required by Rule 386, Rules of Civil Procedure, and for the further reason that the transcript did not include an appeal bond. Counsel for appellant was notified by the clerk of his refusal to file the transcript and statement of facts. On July 26, 1946, an appeal bond was filed in the trial court, which bond was brought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maples v. Service Mut. Ins. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Bruce v. San Antonio Music Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Gist v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Texas State Bank of Alice v. John F. Grant Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Labansat v. Cameron CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howe v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Cox v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Jordan v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. La Barba v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Pettit v. EngelkingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API