Legal Opinion

La Barba v. Eubanks

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1950No. 2907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

This cause has 'been submitted on briefs of the parties subject to appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee says the attempted appeal should be dismissed because (1) this court does not have jurisdiction to review the proceedings of which' complaint is made and (2) the issues involved on the purported appeal are now moot.

The record before us discloses that judgment was entered in the court below on June 3, 1949, in favor of appellee and against appellant for the sum of $14,500.' On June 11th appellant filed an extensive motion to set aside the verdict of the jury and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Backus v. RoperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  2. Bruce v. San Antonio Music Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Alexander Motor Co. v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  4. Grant v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Postell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hicks v. First National Bank in Dalhart, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989
  2. Hicks v. First National Bank in Dalhart, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API