Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pettit v. Engelking

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 1953No. 12563Published

1DissentW. O. Murray, Chief Justice

(dissenting) .

It is my opinion this cause should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction and I therefore dissent from the majority opinion.

The final judgment herein was rendered on December 17, 1952, and no motion for a new trial was filed within the ten-day period allowed by Rule 330(k), T.R.C.P., nor was notice of appeal given within this ten-day period, as is required by Rule 353, T.R.C.P. Thus, upon December 27, 1952, appellant had lost her right to appeal from the only final judgment ever entered in this cause. The question then arises, is there anything that a party may do thereafter to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bridgman v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mullins v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. A. F. Jones & Sons v. Republic Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Reynolds v. Dallas CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cooksey v. JordanTexas Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API