Legal Opinion

Holcombe v. Garland & Denwiddie, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 26, 1931No. 13261PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Boni-iam.

Here is the brief “statement” of the issue submitted to this Court: “Appeal from an order refusing to allow defendant to plead a recovery in an action for personal injuries as a bar to an action for personal damages — all of which arose out of the same negligent act of the defendant.”

History

The case arose as follows: October 10, 1929, W. C. Holcombe began an action in the Court of Common Pleas against Garland & Denwiddie, Inc. The complaint alleged personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident which occurred July 22,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. EndsleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  2. Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  3. Birmingham Southern Railway Co. v. LintnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Henderson v. United States Radiator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. Oxman v. ProfittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. Mills v. De WeesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API