Dugan v. Atlanta Casualty Companies
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael Dugan seeks coverage under his son’s automobile insurance policy with Atlanta Casualty Co. We are asked to determine: (1) whether the terms of that policy extend coverage to all blood relatives of the named insured, regardless of residency; and (2) if not, whether the superior court erred in finding that Dugan, for the purposes of the insurance policy, was not a “resident” of his son’s household. Because we answer both of these questions in the negative, we affirm the superior court’s judgment in favor of Atlanta Casualty Co.
II. FACTS AND…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- U. S. Fire Insurance Co. v. ColverAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Modern Construction, Inc. v. Barce, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. FalgoustAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Henrichs v. Chugach Alaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Kathleen M. Downing v. Country Life Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
- Renaissance Alaska, LLC v. Rutter & Wilbanks Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.