Legal Opinion

Dugan v. Atlanta Casualty Companies

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 2005No. S-11133PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael Dugan seeks coverage under his son’s automobile insurance policy with Atlanta Casualty Co. We are asked to determine: (1) whether the terms of that policy extend coverage to all blood relatives of the named insured, regardless of residency; and (2) if not, whether the superior court erred in finding that Dugan, for the purposes of the insurance policy, was not a “resident” of his son’s household. Because we answer both of these questions in the negative, we affirm the superior court’s judgment in favor of Atlanta Casualty Co.

II. FACTS AND…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. U. S. Fire Insurance Co. v. ColverAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Modern Construction, Inc. v. Barce, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. FalgoustAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Hahn v. GEICO Choice Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Henrichs v. Chugach Alaska Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Kathleen M. Downing v. Country Life Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Renaissance Alaska, LLC v. Rutter & Wilbanks Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API