Legal Opinion
United States v. Samuel Joseph Rugendorf
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 24, 1963No. 13967PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant was tried before a jury and was convicted of receiving, concealing and storing goods, wares and merchandise of a value in excess of $5,000, knowing the same had been stolen and transported in interstate commerce in violation of Section 2315, Title 18 United States Code. The goods were identified in the indictment as 81 fur pieces which had been stolen in Shreveport, Louisiana and Mountain Brook, Alabama, and which had moved in interstate commerce from Shreveport and Mountain Brook to Chicago, Illinois.
On this appeal, defendant argues (1) the evidence was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Quarles and ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- McCoy Gilmore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Larry Joe Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Adams v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. MalinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- United States v. Joe M. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.