Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rugendorf v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1964No. 223Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Douglas,

with whom

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Goldberg concur, dissenting.

Just prior to the presentation by the prosecution of its first witness at the trial, counsel for petitioner re*538quested the name or names of the informers mentioned in the search warrant:

“Mr. Echeles: Roviaro v. United States [353 U. S. 53], which is cited by our Seventh Circuit as authority for this proposition, states that if the informants, if the names of the informants are necessary to a proper defense or a proper presentation of the defendant’s case in attacking the search…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Silber v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. Samuel Joseph RugendorfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API