Legal Opinion

Swope v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1991No. 983 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Eleanor Swope, the claimant, appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board terminating her compensation benefits pursuant to the petition of her employer, Harry Products Inc., for termination under § 413 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 We affirm.

The issue in this case is whether the employer met its burden in proving that it offered the claimant “suitable work” when the employer offered to the claimant a position which she is physically able to perform but not at the same hourly schedule the claimant worked before the work-related…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Latrobe Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. CPV Manufacturing, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API