Legal Opinion

Carmack v. Drum

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1903No. 4706PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeál from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. . William E. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mount, J.

This is an action to recover upon a supersedeas bond given in a case on appeal to this court. Plaintiff was nonsuited by the lower court, and appeals from a judgment thereon.

The facts in the case are substantially as follows: Bespondents Drum & Morgart were tenants from month to month of certain real estate belonging to appellant. On April 2, 1901, appellant brought an action for unlawful detainer against his tenants, Drum & Morgart, for the possession of the premises. A trial was had on June 25, 1901, in said action, and a verdict was…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carmack v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Strader v. LambethCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  3. Capital Brewing Co. v. CrosbieWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Busch v. PollockMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Bank of California v. WhiteNevada Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vancouver National Bank v. KatzWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Smith v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dolin v. WachterMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Paris Grocer Co. v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API