Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. Certain facts essential to the presentation of- the questions of law upon which the judgment must turn will be preliminarily stated. The Consolidated Turnpike Company, a corporation of the State of Virginia, acquired and united two or more toll roads, extending from Norfolk to Ocean View, dn the seashore.
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. Certain facts essential to the presentation of- the questions of law upon which the judgment must turn will be preliminarily stated. The Consolidated Turnpike Company, a corporation of the State of Virginia, acquired and united two or more toll roads, extending from Norfolk to Ocean View, dn the seashore. The land acquired was somewhat more than was needed for a turnpike and so the turnpike company, by warranty deed, conveyed a strip 18 to 25 feet wide to the Bay Shore Terminal Company, also a Virginia corporation, upon which the…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lurton
The case coinés here under § 709, Revised Statutes, now § 237 of the new Judicial Code. It must therefore appear that some right, privilege or immunity was claimed, under the Constitution, or some statute of the United. States, anli that the decision was against the.'right,’privilege or immunity so claimed and specially setup by the plaintiff in error.
The error assigned here is that in permitting the condemnation of the interest of the mortgagees in . the strip of land condemned without including the value of.the. permanent improvements placed thereon by the predecessor in title of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Mallett v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Marvin v. TroutSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Erie Railroad v. PurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Appleby v. City of BuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Colbert v. International Security Bureau, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. Huck Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.