Legal Opinion
Maher v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 1, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
125 N.J. 455 (1991)
593 A.2d 750
EDWARD MAHER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, AND BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 11, 1991.
Decided August 1, 1991.
Sanford R. Oxfeld argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Balk, Oxfeld, Mandell & Cohen, attorneys).
Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Harrier…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.