Legal Opinion
Charlton v. Kelly
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 22, 1907No. 1,445PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Error is assigned to the instruction of the court to the jury on the subject of the marking of the plaintiff in error’s claim. It is said that the substance of the instruction was that it is necessary that a mining claim be marked upon the ground by stakes or other permanent monuments; whereas, the law is that the statute is sufficiently complied with if there is such marking on the ground by stakes, monuments, mounds, and written notices, or otherwise, that *829the boundaries of the location can be readily traced. The instruction of the court upon this branch…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fred Fredericks v. American Export Lines, Inc. S. J. Farrington Iron Works, Inc. v. John W. McGrath CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- State of Arizona v. Dennis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Colt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.