Legal Opinion

Sayward v. Thompson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1895No. 1683PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

On May 3, 1869, pursuant to the act of congress approved April 24, 1820, one Moses Gardner entered and purchased of the United States, at its land office at Olympia, Washington, the premises involved in this controversy, containing ninety-six and fifty-hundredths acres, lying in King county, and thereupon received the usual certificate or “ duplicate final receipt,” from the register and receiver of said office. On May 16, 18.70, said Gardner, for a valuable consid*707eration, indorsed upon said certificate the following: “ This is to certify…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wood v. . ChapinNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  4. Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Sydnor v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1855

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. BrewerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Grand Investment Co. v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Advance Thresher Co. v. EstebOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Peterson v. SlossWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bell v. HamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API