Legal Opinion
State ex rel. State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Kuhwald
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided February 22, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Injunction to enjoin Defendant from Engaging in the practice of optometry.
Extensive discovery was taken and the parties agreed to submit the matter to the Court on the basis of the Record before the Court.
*216The pertinent facts are not disputed by the parties.
Defendant is an optician who supplies contact lenses pursuant to a prescription written by an ophthalmologist. After receiving the prescription from the ophthalmologist, Defendant performs certain acts in examining and measuring the eye and obtaining data necessary for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Delaware Optometric Corporation v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hillman/Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc. v. New Jersey State Board of OptometristsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- State ex rel. State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. KuhwaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
- Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Wyoming State Board of Examiners of Optometry v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989