Rice v. Rice
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POMEROY, Justice.
The parties to this litigation, the plaintiff-appellee and the seven defendant-appellants, are fellow participants in a venture known as the Twin Oaks Hunting Camp. As such, they are the owners of one hundred acres of land in Potter County, Pennsylvania which comprises the camp property. One of the group, Wilbur H. Rice, having apparently become disenchanted with the arrangement, brought the present action in equity to compel a partition of the tract among the eight owners. After the pleadings were closed Rice moved for, and the trial court granted,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Hammermill Paper Co. v. Rust Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Blumer v. DorfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Herman v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Bureau for Child Care v. United Fund of the Philadelphia AreaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Ralston v. RalstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bargo v. KuhnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kopp v. KoppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Consulting Engineers Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.